[ Home / Archive / Internet / Hobbies ] [ RSS ]
Join us on IRC: #mootxico @ irc.rizon.net
Anonymous 2023/02/15(Wed) 05:39:45 GMT No. 100 File:
hmmm.jpeg (80 KB, 882x547) 
What do my mootxibro's think of GPT? Is it going to kill us all and take our jobs?
Anonymous 2023/02/15(Wed) 23:19:04 GMT No. 101 I have exactly 0 idea what that is.
Sounds gay
fag
Anonymous 2023/02/17(Fri) 00:11:37 GMT No. 104 The code generation, ability to write boring generic texts and answer general questions might take some low tier programming, writing and support jobs. Could perhaps create new careers for prompt curators since a computer can't really understand what "quality" is, but the low threshold for quality these days might make the masses just eat up auto prompted garbage.
Not really world ending to me, but it could end up flooding the market with low quality work if used improperly.
A1 2025/04/28(Mon) 08:58:19 GMT No. 788 File:
41Nx0R0k2YL._S(...).jpg (18 KB, 303x445) 
chat with ginormous poo trash
Anonymous 2025/05/03(Sat) 23:57:19 GMT No. 789 >>100
fake and ghey
Anonymous 2025/05/04(Sun) 09:02:01 GMT No. 790 amazingly, the only thing it is any good for is bullshitting homework
Anonymous 2025/08/07(Thu) 11:46:47 GMT No. 811 File:
yayi.jpg (379 KB, 1920x1200) 
As long as everybody understands that anything controlled by a neural net is strictly For Entertainment Purposes Only and that we make sure that it is illegal to use AI for things like making policy decisions, driving cars, writing legal drafts, performing surgery, pushing agendas onto populations, or anything else that might have an inevitably erroneous confabulatory hallucination-induced effect on actual human beings, everything will be great.
Anonymous 2025/11/02(Sun) 17:08:55 GMT No. 828 I've been using it more but I still largely don't trust it due to the fact that it simply makes shit up so much
Anonymous 2026/03/06(Fri) 17:10:05 GMT No. 836 I think people being concerned about it doing fun stuff like making clip art rather than it being used to strip autonomy away from literally everyone who drives on a public road is stupid
Anonymous 2026/03/08(Sun) 12:27:21 GMT No. 837 Magic in Jung's understanding
In closed studies on plasma, bioplasma, UFO and poltergeist phenomena conducted in the 1960-70s in the USA and USSR, such phenomena were proposed to be considered from the point of view of Markov chains, when the state of the system does not depend on its prehistory. A broader interpretation implies independence from the external environment. This approach in the USA was, for example, implemented at the Batelle Memorial Institute, and in the USSR within the framework of psychotronics at the IKEM. Proponents of the approach postulate that this is a fundamental principle of the universe. To implement this principle, either the system itself or a large number of its possible states, the number of degrees of freedom, must be recognized by the observer, since for the observer any external system is fundamentally uncertain. However, the super-complexity of the system, according to some researchers, actually implies that it itself has consciousness, acting as an accomplice for the observer. The observer must also be complex in terms of the level of organization and diversity of his consciousness in order to distinguish as many subtypes of the phenomenon as possible, or at least assume the possibility of this. That is, Markov chains in this understanding are the conceptual legalization of quantum laws in the macrocosm. It is worth noting that in recent years many physicists consider plasma to be a quantum object at the macro level. Within the framework of Soviet psychotronics, M. Lavrentyev suggested that reality is formed by a set of observers who must have a certain level of complexity in their consciousness. For the individual observer, other people, according to Lavrentiev, are also part of his consciousness, which he must endow with complexity. People are important because they are the ones who introduce the description of the world, describing what can exist and what cannot exist. Therefore, people from religious families encounter anomalous phenomena much more often than those fro
Anonymous 2026/03/09(Mon) 20:03:00 GMT No. 838 >>837
>Markov chains, when the state of the system does not depend on its prehistory
That's literally the opposite of what markov chains are
>prehistory
redundant
[Back]
[Catalog]
[Top]
What do my mootxibro's think of GPT? Is it going to kill us all and take our jobs?
chat with ginormous poo trash
As long as everybody understands that anything controlled by a neural net is strictly For Entertainment Purposes Only and that we make sure that it is illegal to use AI for things like making policy decisions, driving cars, writing legal drafts, performing surgery, pushing agendas onto populations, or anything else that might have an inevitably erroneous confabulatory hallucination-induced effect on actual human beings, everything will be great.