Now that 4chan is finally dead (allegedly), how do you even find all the other chans and imageboards or whatever else that feel similar? This place is the only one I know of.
All the degeneracy should be there, I wouldn't feel at home without it. But what I really want is something similar to those slower hobby boards, where people actually talk about what they're eagerly interested in, and where surprisingly smart insights occasionally shine through all their crudeness and degeneracy.
I just want some cool places to lurk time to time....
Anonymous2025/04/20(Sun) 05:47:53 GMTNo.16423 File: applejack DIET(...).png(69 KB, 764x768)>>16422
allchans.org and chan.city are two directories that I found by using a search engine for five seconds. Oh, three seconds later and I found imageboards.net
It's almost as if you can use the internet to look stuff up...
Anonymous2025/04/20(Sun) 05:53:14 GMTNo.16424 >>16423
I don't trust corporate search engines.
I only trust reliable sources of information, like balding 30 year old men on obscure websites with possible personality issues.
Anonymous2025/04/20(Sun) 06:37:24 GMTNo.16425 File: corporations.webm(579 KB, 1280x720)>>16424 >I don't trust corporate search engines.
Why not? Your ISP is run by a corporation. Your hardware was made by one. Your clothes were as well. Do you just like that word, "corporation"? Does it make you feel smart? Alt? Interesting?
Anonymous2025/04/20(Sun) 11:30:24 GMTNo.16426 >>16422
it isnt dead. it'll be back within a week
Anonymous2025/04/21(Mon) 17:39:12 GMTNo.16437 >>16422
7chan.org is the only true alternative to 4chan. its the oldest one now that 4chan is down.
Anonymous2025/04/21(Mon) 19:45:42 GMTNo.16438 >>16437
I don't think you're going to get the modern 4chan experience from 7chan, that would be more 8chan. 7chan is in the "4chan but better" category of imageboards as of now.
Anonymous2025/04/21(Mon) 21:55:47 GMTNo.16439 I think Heyuri is the only true 4chan-like experience left (it's in the 2005ish style). But the mods are bipolar and I'm not sure I trust them to keep the site sane. For example, despite the ruleset, they decided Ai trash is A-OK nowadays.
There are plenty of options for nu4chan. Notably the soy site and 8shit.
This really only leaves here as anything even remotely 4chan-like as far as I'm concerned.
Anonymous2025/04/21(Mon) 23:07:25 GMTNo.16440 >>16439
why should AI be explicitly b& on Heyuri? Simply because this instance of it is new?
Anonymous2025/04/21(Mon) 23:18:50 GMTNo.16441 >>16440
NTA. Besides just being very ugly, AI anime pictures is extremely offensive to the medium, and if you explicitly create a site to mimic retro imageboard culture then it boggles the mind as to why you'd ever allow it. Enjoying AI stuff in general is a very good predictor of retardation.
Anonymous2025/04/21(Mon) 23:38:49 GMTNo.16443 File: fuckmyshitup.JPG(37 KB, 606x604)>>16441 >NTA
You don't need to say that, you know. This is an anonymous imageboard; answer in someone else's stead if you like >AI anime pictures is extremely offensive to the medium
The "medium" as in anime? I think anime AI art generation has become so successful because anime is almost an inherently unoriginal style of work. I get why art teachers refuse to have it in their classes > if you explicitly create a site to mimic retro imageboard culture then it boggles the mind as to why you'd ever allow it
How is it inherently antithetical to old imageboard culture? If it came around in 2004 would it be more palatable to you? >Enjoying AI stuff in general is a very good predictor of retardation
Something tells me you just don't like it very much
Anonymous2025/04/22(Tue) 01:04:35 GMTNo.16444 >>16443
You are either soulless, stupid or alternatively under 18
Najarin2025/04/22(Tue) 01:26:21 GMTNo.16446 File: 8ef.png(755 KB, 947x774)>>16444
Checked for trips of truth
>>16443
Sorry m9, looks like you ARE soulless, stupid, and under 18
Anonymous2025/04/22(Tue) 04:28:42 GMTNo.16449 File: reshiram cover.JPG(79 KB, 665x661)>>16444 >souless
So it is a matter of opinion. Okay, cool. You can address each point if you like or you can just steam over support for a blind Twitter opinion.
Anyways, I think "soul" lies in genuine interactions over the Internet or subtle IRL connections to the Internet. AI has no say in that, and Heyuri exists on the brink of forcing scenekid-esque interactions from nostalgiateens and becoming an incubator of faggotry. The administration has denied this, and I'd assume that banning AI because it wasn't around at a certain time would throw the entire website into the currently closed pool >>16446 >trips of truth
Mootxi.co is too slow for it to work like that, namefag
Najarin2025/04/22(Tue) 06:37:43 GMTNo.16451 >>16449
tldr, fucking hell you really are under 18 or something. If not , than you are one sad fuck arguing for 5 hours about A.I. anime porn
Anonymous2025/04/22(Tue) 08:46:06 GMTNo.16453 >>16440
Not inherently banned, but banned in general in the same way that slangs are banned: because they don't add anything interesting by default, they're just tired and easy unoriginal contents (i.e. with the usual exceptions that is also granted to slangs: when they make sense and bring in lulz it's fine).
Would you say it's fine to replace all post contents by gpt-generated stuff, too? If not, why not? If so, why even have imageboards anymore?
To me, it is because the point of imageboards is to share and discuss interesting contents (frankly, not even just images, even though that's an important part of it), rather than regurgitate as much low-quality slop as possible. This requires unique thoughts and drive behind the posts and the images that are posted, i.e. there should be intent.
Thus there are acceptable uses for AI posting in rare cases only.
Original thought can just be some stupid pun you just thought about, a dumb idea you've had, etc., but none of that can come out of AI generated shit. When it does, it still wouldn't make sense to share it, but it would make sense to use it for entertainment and to be inspired by it (because even when quality becomes so high it is human-grade, the qualitative nature differs).
Anonymous2025/04/22(Tue) 16:32:26 GMTNo.16456 File: 1652932270741.jpg(92 KB, 1015x787)>>16453 >Would you say it's fine to replace all post contents by gpt-generated stuff, too?
We were talking aobut image generation, which still takes user input. That's a disingenuous point. >but none of that can come out of AI generated shit
How so? There's an entire well written MLP fan episode generated with AI voices [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLGlrY7cooY]. Eli Chester Animations uses AI generation to make the sprites for his videos and they're entertaining as hell [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCf6uv_FmEs].
You keep on making these lofty, nonsensical arguments that barely address the topic of "AI generated art", which is what we were talking about. It sounds like you hopped on some anti-AI bandwagon probably because you appreciate art and like sketching (I do too, mind you).
AI is a tool; just because you don't like it doesn't mean you have to confabulate reasons why it is some inherent bad.
Anonymous2025/04/22(Tue) 17:04:36 GMTNo.16457 >>16456
There is 0 difference between the operations of an image generation and text generation algorithm. A disingenous is you.
Or not, you clearly have brain problems to enjoy such astoundingly quality-less (not to say low quality, that would be an insult to low quality) "content".
More power to you!
Anonymous2025/04/22(Tue) 17:27:30 GMTNo.16458 File: she's a guy.jpg(42 KB, 897x573)>>16457 >There is 0 difference between the operations of an image generation and text generation algorithm
One generates text and the other generates images
Anonymous2025/04/22(Tue) 18:18:38 GMTNo.16459 >>16458 >operations = results >one generates bytes and the other generates bytes
I rest my case.
Anonymous2025/04/22(Tue) 19:23:33 GMTNo.16460 >>16457 >>16441 >>16453
WHY RESISTING AI MAKES YOU A DINOSAUR (AND NOT THE COOL KIND):
TEXT? YOU’RE STILL TYPING?
ChatGPT writes novels while you’re still STARING AT A BLINKING CURSOR. Need a poem, a screenplay, or a breakup text that destroys souls? AI does it in 3 SECONDS. Your “creative process”? That’s just PROCRASTINATION WITH A THESAURUS.
“SOULLESS ART”? SPARE US.
MidJourney’s nightmares are MORE VISCERAL THAN YOUR GRAD SCHOOL PORTFOLIO. Generate a cyberpunk sushi chef or a Renaissance cat wearing Air Jordans while you’re still MIXING ACRYLICS. Your “authenticity” is just COPIED FROM PINTEREST.
MUSIC: BEETHOVEN’S GHOST USES SUNO.AI NOW.
Why hire a composer when AI drops SYNTHWAVE BANGERS that make your ex’s playlist sound like elevator music? Your garage band’s “raw sound” is just BAD MIC QUALITY.
VIDEO? YOUR iMOVIE TRIAL EXPIRED IN 2012.
Sora generates CINEMATIC MASTERPIECES from a text prompt. You? You’re still arguing about aspect ratios and crying over BUFFERING ICONS.
“BUT ETHICS!”
Yeah, keep preaching about “artistic integrity” from your UNPAID INTERNSHIP. Meanwhile, AI is paying mortgages. Your moral high ground? ZERO CLIENTS, ZERO CLOUT.
Anonymous2025/04/22(Tue) 20:24:00 GMTNo.16461 my laptop's battery is currently at 3% please help me
Anonymous2025/04/22(Tue) 21:22:48 GMTNo.16463 >>16461
Have you tried charging it?
Najarin2025/04/23(Wed) 06:06:11 GMTNo.16467 File: et.tu.gif(969 KB, 245x200)>>16462
The banned will go, but I'm afraid you've gone hungry with power, m9. You have an awesome site, don't give up on it.
Anonymous2025/04/23(Wed) 08:34:13 GMTNo.16468 I still liked it, anyone know when they will fix it?
Najarin2025/04/23(Wed) 08:42:51 GMTNo.16469 And furthermore I love having huge smelly cocks stuffed down my womanly throat